This seems to be the new buzz word on the web.
I printed out the markers on A4 and gave it a try. Since A4 isn’t that sturdy the marker got distorted and both examples had a lot of trouble picking it up. Also I tried it at night in the study with a single light on. This resulted in a glare on the marker and of course this interfered with the recognition. The low light conditions didn’t help much either, it seems a low(er) contrast really throws the marker recognition off. All in all AR software seems to be quite sensitive to imperfections.
[Click the image above to run the example, I’ve used the same marker as the Boffswana example.]
If you run my test, you’ll see that it’s quite sluggish as well, you’re lucky if you get 6+ frames per second. This is due to the marker detection method ( FLARSingleMarkerDetector.detectMarkerLite() ). Sometimes this method takes up to 1300 ms to detect the marker, on average it takes about 150 ms.
The Flash community has always been really fast on picking new technolgy up, but I’m afraid this is a little bit too high end for Flash at the moment.
Some possible solutions:
- Glue the printed marker to a piece of cardboard to get it a bit more steady so it won’t be bent as much and is easier to pick up by the AR software.
- Marker detection doesn’t work that well with low light conditions. When I was at FlashCamp Seb (from PV3D) had a good idea. Just process the camera image, make it black and white and crank up the brightness and contrast.
- As for processing speed, maybe something clever with pixel bender? Could Alchemy help?